Charity watchdog turns the spotlight on RSPCA over claims it bullies opposing lawyers and whistleblowers
- Charity Commission to raise concerns in a meeting with trustees
- Suicide of a former inspector who RSPCA publicly attacked sparked review
- Bosses face claims of discrediting barristers who represented opponents
By Valerie Elliott and Lynne Wallis
PUBLISHED: 22:19 GMT, 28 September 2013 | UPDATED: 23:33 GMT, 28 September 2013
The RSPCA is being scrutinised by the Charity Commission over claims that it uses intimidatory and bullying tactics, particularly when bringing prosecutions for animal cruelty.
The Mail on Sunday has learned that the watchdog has written to various organisations and voluntary groups asking for specific examples of such behaviour by the RSPCA.
The concerns are expected to be raised by the Commission at a meeting with RSPCA trustees.
The incidents that have triggered the review include the suicide in May of Dawn Aubrey-Ward, 43, a former RSPCA inspector whose character and integrity the charity had publicly attacked.
After she accused the RSPCA of unnecessarily killing healthy animals, the charity posted a critical statement about her on its website and she was besieged by hate mail, death threats and abusive telephone calls.
The charity has also been accused of ‘hounding’ barrister Jonathan Rich, who defended hundreds of people it prosecuted.
He claims he had to spend £1 million to protect himself against spurious complaints made to his professional body, the Bar Standards Board.
His allegations are echoed by Norfolk vet Colin Vogel, who has appeared for the defence in numerous animal cruelty cases.
He says the RSPCA attempted to discredit him with complaints to the Society of Expert Witnesses, the Law Society and the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons.
There have been scores of similar claims over recent years and a so-called Self Help Group has even been set up for farmers and pet owners experiencing difficulty with the animal charity.
Anne Kasica, a spokeswoman for the SHG, declined to comment on the Charity Commission’s action.
The Charity Commission denied there was a formal investigation into the RSPCA but confirmed that a new officer had taken over responsibility for liaising with it.
A spokeswoman said the official ‘had been undertaking some fact-finding research. This involved corresponding with various parties about their experience with the charity’.
She added that the officer could raise any problems with RSPCA trustees and that, if there were serious questions to be answered, a formal inquiry could be launched.
She said: ‘We are now taking the opportunity to meet personally with the trustees for an informal dialogue.’
A spokesman for the RSPCA said: ‘The Charity Commission has confirmed that it is not investigating.’
But Barney White-Spunner, the Countryside Alliance’s executive chairman, said it did not matter what the Commission called the talks: ‘It amounts to the same thing, an investigation or an enquiry.
‘We are very pleased that the RSPCA’s role as a private prosecutor is being examined.’
rspcaanimalcruelty 